-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- 2013 Race
- Above two embedded videos
- Abuse of power
- Assault On Democracy
- Autocracy
- Backroom Deals
- Blocks Animal Protections
- Blog
- Campaign Corruption
- Campaign Trail
- Carriage horses
- Conflict of Interest
- Dirty Politics
- Fake Charities
- Free Assembly
- Human rights record
- Kills veto-proof bills
- LGBT
- Local & Federal Investigations
- Lying to the Public
- Newsletters
- Obstructs Human Rights
- OTHER
- Overheard
- Overturned Term Limits
- Pets
- Piggy Bank
- Quinn's record
- Real Estate
- Separation of powers
- Slush Funds
- Tenants
- Term Limits
- The Money
- Uncategorized
- Using City Resources
- Workers
Author Archives: donny
Related contribution
“Quinn took in more than $17,000 in campaign donations connected to Hudson Yards developer Related Cos. since the start of 2012 . . . During the same six-month period, Quinn privately negotiated a deal that gave the firm a break from the recently passed law that raises to $10 an hour the pay for lower-income employees who work for companies that receive major subsidies from City Hall.”
Quinn punishes CMs
“Council Member Fernando Cabrera of the Bronx, who was toward the bottom of the pack with roughly $550,000, said Ms. Quinn uses the [discretionary] funds to reward her allies. He said wide disparities show ‘we are not attending to the poor and the needy in an equitable way. What’s the point of some members getting more than others? That’s the way they control the council. A system shouldn’t operate on the basis of fear.'”
Posted in Abuse of power, Assault On Democracy
Allon: Campaign Cash is Tainted
“Local Law 34 lowered the maximum political contributions from those doing business with the city to $400. But due to a loophole, officeholders like Quinn could hold on to the maximum $4,950 donations from those doing business with the city. . . This new law was designed to hinder, if not end, the age-old, transactional ‘pay-to-play’ politics that had favored the few for so long at the expense of the many. Why would the Council allow incumbents to keep money received under limits it judged to be more than 10 times too high, potentially undermining this good- government reform?”
Posted in Campaign Corruption, Conflict of Interest






